Publications Ethics
This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing a manuscript in the Jurnal Sains Manajemen including the authors, editors, and reviewers.
This statement is based on COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
1. Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The publication of a manuscript is very important to note regarding its ethics, this is also included in the Jurnal Sains Manajemen. Jurnal Sains Manajemen publishes manuscripts on the results of both theoretical and empirical studies from various authoritative sources that can be accounted for. This is important for the development of science to be implemented in the economic development of a country. Thus, a coherent and respected knowledge network needs to be carried out in the Journal publication Ethics Guidelines. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the supporting institutions. Manuscripts in the Jurnal Sains Manajemen are peer-reviewed to support and realize the scientific method. It is then important to agree on the expected standards of ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing, namely the authors, journal editors, reviewers, publishers and the public.
Master in Science Management Programe, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Palangka Raya takes its custodial duties beyond all stages of issuance very seriously and we carry it out with ethics and other responsibilities. Master in Science Management Programe, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Palangka Raya is committed to ensuring that broadcasting, reprinting or other commercial revenues have no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
2. Publication Decisions
Prior to publishing both online and in print for the Jurnal Sains Manajemen, the Chief Editor who is responsible for publishing requests input from other editors as well as support for suggestions from reviewers. Where, it is also based on a series of journal publications starting from submitting manuscripts, checking editors, checking reviewers, checking layouts, checking plagiarism and copyright. This was under the supervision of the Chief Editor and other Editors with authority, so that a publication decision emerged for the manuscript in the Jurnal Sains Manajemen.
3. Non-Discrimination
In each publication process of the Jurnal Sains Manajemen, editors and reviewers evaluate manuscripts for the scholarly content of the manuscript without referring to the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the author. This is done in order to uphold the ethics of publishing the Jurnal Sains Manajemen, namely non-discrimination.
4. Confidentiality
Manuscripts published in the Jurnal Sains Manajemen are highly guarded for their information value, where editors and reviewers are not allowed to disclose much information about a manuscript that has been submitted to anyone from the author, reviewer, editorial team, and publisher, but only those that are appropriate and naturally.
5. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Unpublished material disclosed in a submitted manuscript does not have to be used by many members of the editorial board and reviewers in their own research.
Duties and Obligations of Reviewers
1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Publishing manuscripts in the Jurnal Sains Manajemen involves reviewers in their fields, the decisions of the reviewers contribute to the editor's decisions for each manuscript. Jurnal Sains Manajemen uses a blind-reviewer process, where the results of the reviewers are communicated back to the authors to improve the quality of the authors' research.
2. Speed
Jurnal Sains Manajemen pays great attention to the timeliness of publication and information to authors. Every manuscript that is entered in the Jurnal Sains Manajemen is informed to the authors and reviewers for the process according to the basic provisions. If the reviewer does not carry out his duties on time, then the editor takes the decision to replace another, more qualified reviewer. In order for the speed of publication time to remain consistent according to what has been set.
3. Confidentiality
Every manuscript that is submitted is kept confidential by the editors, reviewers and publishers. Given the blind-reviewer system, every manuscript that enters the reviewer can only be discussed with the editor and the author.
4. Objectivity Standards
Every manuscript that is entered in the Jurnal Sains Manajemen, editors and reviewers are required to evaluate the manuscript based on established standards. However, review comments from editors and reviewers need to respect the authors. As well as the reviewers are required to be consistent in their decisions and recommendations to the editors and writers.
5. Acknowledgment of Sources
The reviewers are required to pay attention to every source that comes from all manuscripts that enter the Jurnal Sains Manajemen, where the manuscript is sent by the author through the editor. Each source needs to be known for its truth and up-to-date, and acknowledged through a list of trusted references.
6. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Specific information or ideas obtained through peer-reviews must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with the authors, companies, or other institutions associated with the research.
Duties and Responsibilities of Authors
1. Reporting Standards
The authors are required to provide accounting data and informative information on the work submitted to the Jurnal Sains Manajemen. The data presented contains reference sources that can be accounted for and included in the manuscript. Fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
2. Data Access and Retention
Authors may be asked about data and information in the manuscript, so they are required to provide data and information related to the manuscript in a timely manner to the editor and reviewer. This is to facilitate the refinement of the author's manuscript in accordance with the rules of the Jurnal Sains Manajemen.
3. Originality and Plagiarism
Authors should ensure that they have written a completely original work, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of another person's work, it must be properly cited. If several problems are found related to citation and/or plagiarism in the author's work, then the manuscript is automatically rejected.
4. Publication Duplication
When the author submits a manuscript for publication in the Jurnal Sains Manajemen, the author is not allowed to send the manuscript to other publishers simultaneously. Simultaneous submission of the authors was considered unethical and unacceptable for the manuscript.
5. Acknowledgment of Sources
Each manuscript submitted by the author to the Jurnal Sains Manajemen must provide recognition of sources that are appropriate and able to add value to the manuscript, all of these recognitions must be clearly listed on the list of references.
6. Research Authorship
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the research reported in manuscripts submitted to the Jurnal Sains Manajemen. The authors listed in the manuscript have a responsibility to keep co-authors posted with the review process. If accepted, all authors are required to provide a signed statement that the research work is their original research work.
7. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects
If the work involves chemicals, procedures or devices that have many unusual hazards inherent in the author's use, they must clearly identify these in the manuscript.
8. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript all the things that support their research being completed. All supporting financial resources for research should be disclosed.
9. Fundamental Errors in Published Works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work, it is the author's obligation to immediately notify the editor or publisher of the journal and work with the editor to withdraw or correct the research.
