ELDEST DAUGHTER SYNDROME: KONSTRUKSI SOSIAL, BIAS GENDER, DAN PEMBENTUKAN BEBAN PERAN ANAK PEREMPUAN PERTAMA DALAM KELUARGA

Authors

  • Alifa Izzatun Nisa Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Wilodati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Puspita Wulandari Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59700/js.v9i1.24351

Keywords:

Bias Gender, Eldest Daughter Syndrome, Konflik Peran, Sosialisasi Keluarga

Abstract

The phenomenon of Eldest Daughter Syndrome is increasingly discussed on social media, particularly on the X platform, where posts highlight the excessive burden placed on the eldest daughter. Complaints regarding domestic demands, high expectations to set a good example for younger siblings, caregiving roles, and emotional pressure indicate that this condition is not merely an individual issue but part of a social construct shaped by family socialisation patterns. This study aims to analyse how family socialisation, gender norms, and role expectations contribute to the emergence of the Eldest Daughter Syndrome. The research employs a qualitative approach, using data from social media posts. Analysis is conducted using thematic analysis to identify narrative patterns related to the division of roles within the family and gender bias. The findings indicate that the role of the eldest daughter is shaped through a socialisation process that places an unequal burden of responsibility upon her, making her vulnerable to role conflict, feelings of guilt when prioritising her own needs, stress, and emotional exhaustion. This study underscores the importance of family awareness in restructuring role divisions to ensure a fairer distribution, thereby preventing the repeated pressure on the eldest daughter.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
DOI: 10.59700/js.v9i1.24351 DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.59700/js.v9i1.24351
Views: 0 | Downloads: 0

References

Azmi, N. (2025) Memahami Eldest Daughter Syndrome dan Dampaknya, Hallo Sehat. Available at: http://hellosehat.com/mental/mental-lainnya/eldest-daughter-syndrome/.

Batubara, M.Z. and Fila, D.L. De (2023) ‘Poken Bante: a Tradition of the Mandailing Community in Welcoming Eid Al-Fitr’, Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion, 8(2), pp. 171–186. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18784/analisa.v8i2.2105.

Creswell, J.W. (2014) Research Design, Qualitatives, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fourth Edition). Singapore: SAGE Publications.

Kozinets, R. V (2015) Netnography: Redefined. SAGE Publications.

Maulidia, H. (2021) ‘Perempuan dalam Kajian Sosiologi Gender: Konstruksi Peran Sosial, Ruang Publik, dan Teori Feminis’, Journal of Politics and Democracy, 1(1), pp. 71–79. Available at: https://doi.org/10.61183/polikrasi.v1i1.6.

Mulia, S.M. (2007) Keadilan dan Kesetaraan Gender. Yogyakarta: LKiS.

Nawir, M. and Risfaisal, R. (2015) ‘Subordinasi Anak Perempuan Dalam Keluarga’, Equilibrium: Jurnal Pendidikan, 3(1), pp. 29–37. Available at: https://doi.org/10.26618/equilibrium.v3i1.510.

Noviani, J. and Paramita, S. (2023) ‘Pola Komunikasi Orang Tua Etnis Tionghua Medan dalam Mendidik Anak’, Koneksi, 7(1), pp. 21–27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24912/kn.v7i1.15973.

Nuqul, F.L. (2020) Teori peran (role theory). Available at: https://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/3755/1/Teori Peran_Role Theory.pdf.

Pratiwi, A. (2021) ‘Gerakan feminis digital di Indonesia’, Jurnal Perempuan, 26(2).

Rahmat, G., Sa’diah, H. and Januar (2025) ‘Proses sosialisasi di keluarga, sekolah, dan masyarakat’, Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan Nusantara, 6(4), pp. 584–603. Available at: https://ejurnals.com/ojs/index.php/jdpn/article/view/3860.

Seftian, K. (2024) ‘Eldest Daughter Syndrome’: Beratnya Jadi Anak Sulung Perempuan, Magdalene. Available at: https://magdalene.co/story/pengertian-eldest-daughter-syndrome/.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-11

How to Cite

Alifa Izzatun Nisa, Wilodati, & Puspita Wulandari. (2026). ELDEST DAUGHTER SYNDROME: KONSTRUKSI SOSIAL, BIAS GENDER, DAN PEMBENTUKAN BEBAN PERAN ANAK PEREMPUAN PERTAMA DALAM KELUARGA. Jurnal Sosiologi UPR, 9(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.59700/js.v9i1.24351