Detection of Species DNA in Chicken Meatball Products Using NGF Genes as Molecular Markers

Detection of Species DNA in Chicken Meatball Products Using NGF Genes as Molecular Markers


  • Alfi Sophian National Food and Drug Testing Development Center, National Agency of Drug and Food Control of Indonesia



DNA, Chicken, Gene, NGF, Meat balls


Species DNA detection in chicken meatball products using the NGF gene as a molecular marker was carried out to see if the NGF gene could be used to test species DNA detection in chicken meatball processed food products. The test method used in this study is the SYBR green test method which is read using real-time PCR and the extraction technique used is the centrifuge column technique. The test results in this technique can be in the form of Ct (Cycling) and Tm (Melting Temperature) values. The results showed that the DNA isolation carried out showed that the concentration and purity of the isolated DNA were in the range of 51,100 ng/µL – 52,300ng/µL with an average of 51,883 ng/µL. As for the value of purity is the absorption value measured at wavelength A260/A280, the results are obtained in the range between 1,850 – 1,920 with an average of 1,880. The results of the real-time PCR analysis obtained the Ct value of the chest sample at 21.10, the Ct LOD value at 25.20 and the positive control Ct value at 20.30. For the Tm value of the busty sample at 78.20, the Tm LOD value at 78.80 and the positive control Tm value at 79.10. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the genetic markers of the NGF gene can be used to test specific DNA detection of chicken species in processed chicken meatball products so that this test method can be used to detect species DNA.


Download data is not yet available.


Abinawanto, Sophian A, Lestari R, Bowolaksono A, Efendi PS, Afnan R. 2019. Analysis of IGF-1 gene in ayam ketawa (Gallus gallus domesticus) with dangdut and slow type vocal characteristics. Biodiversitas, 20: 2004 -2010.

Bertaux, O., E. Toselli-Mollereau, Auffray & C.M. Devignes. 2004. Alternative usage of 5 Exons in the Chicken Nerve Growth Factor Gene: Refined Characterization of a Weakly Expressed Gene. Journal on Gene and Genome, 3(3): 83–97.

Cai, H., Gu, X., Scanlan, M.S. 2012. Ramatlapeng D.H. and Lively, C.R. “Real-time PCR assays for detection and quantitation of porcine and bovine DNA in gelatin mixtures and gelatin capsules. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 25: 83–87.

Kamau E, Alemayehu S, Feghali KC, Saunders D, Ockenhouse CF. 2013. Multiplex qPCR for detection and absolute quantification of Malaria. PLoS One. 8(8): e71539.

Manca, A., S. Capsoni, A.D. Luzio, D. Vignone, F. Malerba, R. Brandi, F. Paoletti, I. Arisi, A. Cattaneo & R. Levi-Montalcini. 2011. Nerve Growth Factor Regulates Axial Rotation During Early Stages of Chick Embryo Development. Journal PNAS, 109(6): 2009-2014.

Peng, W. et al., 2019. Molecular identification of the Danzhou chicken breed in China using DNA barcoding. Mitochondrial DNA Part B, 4(2), pp.2459–2463.

Piknova L, Kaclikova L, Pangallo D, Polek B, Kuchta T. 2005. Quantification of Salmonella by 5’-nuclease real-time polymerase chain reaction targeted to fimC gene. Curr Microbiol 50: 38-42.

Qiagen. 2020. DNeasy® mericon® Food Handbook. For extraction of total nucleic acids from a range of food sample types. Technical Support Website

Sari E.P, Kartikasari L.R, and M. Cahyadi, “Detection of chicken contamination in beef meatball using duplex-PCR Cyt b gene,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 193, p. 012010, Apr. 2017.

Sophian, A., Purwaningsih, R., Lukita, B. L., & Ningsih, E. C. 2020. Detection of Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028 in supplement health product liquid preparation using Real-Time PCR (qPCR). Biofarmasi Journal of Natural Product Biochemistry, 18(2). doi:10.13057/biofar/f180202.

Sophian A, Purwaningsih R, Muindar, Igirisa E P J, & Amirullah M L. 2021. Short Communication: Analysis of purity and concentration of DNA extracted from intron patho gene-spin extraction on crab processed food product samples. Asian J Trop Biotechnol 18: 13-27.

Sophian, A. 2021. Short Communication: Analysis of purity and concentration of extracted DNA on salted fish processed food products. Asian Journal of Natural Product Biochemistry, 19(1). doi:10.13057/biofar/f190104.

Sophian, A. 2021. Analysis of the Results of DNA Isolation from Chicken Feather Sampled from the Base of the Young Feathers, the base of the Old Feathers and the Ends of the Feathers. BIOEDUSCIENCE 5(2). Retrieved from

Sophian, A., Purwaningsih, R., Muindar, M., Igirisa, E. P. J., & Amirullah, M. L. 2021. Detection of Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028 in Powder Prepared Traditional Medicines Using Real-Time PCR. Borneo Journal of Pharmacy, 4(3), 178-183.

Srisutham S, Saralamba N, Malleret B, Re L. 2017. Four human Plasmodium species quantification using droplet digital PCR. PLoS One. 12(4): e0175771.

WHO. 2016. Establishment of PCR laboratory in developing countries, 2nd edition. 1-96. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication data. ISBN 978-92-9022-531-7.

Xu W, Morris U, Aydin-Schmidt B, Msellem MI, Shakely D, Petzold M, et al. 2015. SYBR green real-time PCR-RFLP assay targeting the Plasmodium cytochrome B gene - A highly sensitive molecular tool for malaria parasite detection and species determination. PLoS One. 10(3): e0120210

Yacoub H.A, Fathi M.M, and M. A. Sadek. 2015. Using cytochromebgene of mtDNA as a DNA barcoding marker in chicken strains,” Mitochondrial DNA, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 217–223.

Yacoub H.A & Fathi MM. 2013. Phylogenetic analysis using d-loop marker of mtDNA of Saudi native chicken strains, Mitochondrial DNA, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 538–551.

Yacoub HA, Fathi MM, & W. M. Mahmoud. 2013. DNA barcode through cytochromebgene information of mtDNA in native chicken strains,” Mitochondrial DNA, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 528–537.




How to Cite

Sophian, A. (2021). Detection of Species DNA in Chicken Meatball Products Using NGF Genes as Molecular Markers: Detection of Species DNA in Chicken Meatball Products Using NGF Genes as Molecular Markers. BiosciED: Journal of Biological Science and Education, 2(2), 47–51.



Biological Sciences