KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN SISWA SMP DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL LITERASI MATEMATIKA PADA SISWA TIPE ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37304/enggang.v3i1.8576Keywords:
Mathematical Reasoning, Mathematical Literacy Problems, Adversity Quotient (AQ)Abstract
This study describes students' mathematical reasoning abilities to solve mathematical literacy questions on adversity quotient (AQ) type students qualitatively. The researcher collected data from VIII-H class students at SMP Negeri 1 Gemuh, totaling 31 students using purposive sampling with the help of the mathematics teacher's consideration of where to conduct the research. The subjects selected in this study consisted of 6 subjects, namely two subjects with AQ quitters (low), two types of AQ campers (medium), and two types of AQ climbers (high). Data collection techniques used Adversity Response Profile (ARP) questionnaire instruments, written tests, documentation. The analysis technique is done by reducing data, presenting data, and drawing conclusions. Data validity checking techniques use technical and source triangulation. The results showed that 1) students with the AQ climbers type gave rise to five indicators of mathematical reasoning, namely making conjectures, manipulating mathematics, determining patterns to make generalizations, compiling evidence or reasons for correct solutions, and drawing conclusions. 2) students with AQ type campers bring up four indicators of mathematical reasoning, namely making conjectures, doing mathematical manipulation, determining patterns to make generalizations, and drawing conclusions. 3) students with the AQ quitter type are only able to bring up two indicators of reasoning, namely making conjectures and manipulating.
Downloads
References
Aziz, H. E., & Hidayati, N. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa SMP Pada Materi Aritmatika Sosial. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 1(4), 759. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v1i4.p759-764
Hasnawati. (2016). Description of Mathematics Literacy Ability Of Students First Secondary School State 15 Kendari Based On Content, Context, Materials, And Process. International Journal of Education and Research, 4(11), 201–210.
Herbert, S., Vale, C., Bragg, L.A., Loong, E., & Widjaja, W. (2014). Primary School Teacher’s Perceptions of Mathematical Reasoning. Proceedings of the Thirty Seventh Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 466-472). Melbourne: MERGA.
Lestari, N. R. (2019). Analisis Proses Penalaran Matematis Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (AQ) (Doctoral dissertation, University of Muhammadiyah Malang).
Maini, N., & Izzati, N. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Berdasarkan Langkah-Langkah Brainsford & Steint Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Jurnal Kiprah, 7(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.31629/kiprah.v7i1.1175
Muharom, T. (2014). Pengaruh Pembelajaran dengan Model Kooperatif Tipe Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran dan Komunikasi Matematik Peserta Didik di SMK Negeri Manonjaya. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Keguruan, 1(1).
Noviani, A. R. (2018). Analisis Proses Penalaran Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Dtinjau Pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Berdasarkan Kemampuan Akademik Kelas X-AK-2 SMK PGRI 1 Tulungagung. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(1), 99–113.
Nursoffina, M., & Efendi, N. (2022). Analysis of the Relationship between Mathematical Reasoning and Problem Solving of Elementary Students Mathematics Material. Academia Open, 6, 6–11.
OECD (2013). PISA 2012 Assassement and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. Diakses dari http://www.oecd.org pada tanggal 23 November 2022.
Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics literacy: Are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use. Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 89–100.
Quintasari, D., Budayasa, I. K., & Sulaiman, R. (2021). Profil Penalaran Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gender. MATHEdunesa, 10(3), 490–496. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v10n3.p490-496
Saniyyah, F., & Winiati, I. (2020). Analisis Penalaran Adaptif Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Adversity Quotient (AQ). Indonesian Journal of Mathematics and Natural Science Education, 1(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.35719/mass.v1i2.3
Setiawan, H., Dafik, & Lestari, N. D. S. (2014). Soal Matematika Dalam Pisa Kaitannya Dengan Literasi Matematika Dan Keterampilan Berfikir Tingkat Tinggi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, November, 244–251.
Stoltz. 2000. Adversity Quotient: Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang. Jakarta: Grasindo
Wardono, 2013. Peningkatan Literasi Matematika Melalui Pembelajaran Inovatif Berpenilaian Programme for International Student Assessment. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Evaluasi Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Semarang. Semarang.
Widyastuti, R., Usodo, B., & Riyadi. (2013). Proses Berpikir Siswa SMP Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Langkah- Langkah Polya Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Jurmal Pembelajaran Matematika, 1(3), 239–249.
Zuhri, M. S., & Purwosetiyono, F. D. (2019). Profil Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Pada Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika. JIPMat, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v4i1.3548.
