OBSERVING THE REALITY OF PUBLIC SECTOR AUDIT IN ERADICATION OF CORRUPTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52300/jemba.v3i1.10867Keywords:
Public sector audit; , Corruption; , BPKAbstract
This study aims to examine the reality of public sector audits in efforts to eradicate corruption in Indonesia. The analysis covers a number of aspects related to the implementation of public sector audits in supporting the eradication of corruption. The data was obtained using the perspective of seven experienced BPK auditors. In-depth interviews were conducted using semi-structured questions. The research results reveal a number of realities regarding public sector audits, namely the nature of public sector audits which are not specifically designed to routinely detect corruption, differences in the authority of examiners and law enforcers, and the relationship between auditors and auditees in the audit process. Therefore, to be more proactive in increasing the effectiveness of the public sector audit function in order to support the eradication of corruption, extensive efforts are needed both by individual auditors and by the BPK institutionally
Downloads
References
Assakaf, E. A., Samsudin, R. S., & Othman, Z. (2018). Public sector auditing and corruption: A literature review. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 10(1), 227–241.
Bastian, I. (2015). Audit sektor publik pemeriksaan pertanggungjawaban pemerintahan (3rd ed.). Salemba Empat.
Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2017). Standar pemeriksaan keuangan negara (Nomor 1).
Gherai, D. S., Tara, I. G., & Matica, D. E. (2016). The supreme audit institution can control the corruption or not? Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, 1(2), 465–476.
Gustavson, M., & Sundström, A. (2018). Organizing the audit society: Does good auditing generate less public sector corruption? Administration & Society, 50(10), 1508–1532.
Jeppesen, K. K. (2019). The role of auditing in the fight against corruption. The British Accounting Review, 51(5), 100798.
Khan, M. A. (2006). Role of audit in fighting corruption.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2019). Modul tindak pidana korupsi.
Kristinae, V., Sambung, R., Meitiana, M., Mering, L., Dwiatmadja, C., & Tunjang, H. (2023). Application of RBV theory in entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capability and customer relationship management. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(2), 707–712.
Lendra, L., Gawei, A. B. P., Sintani, L., Afanda, D. M., & Tjakra, J. (2023). The assessment of occupational safety and health risk management on construction projects during the Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Disaster Management, 6(1), 1–18.
Liu, J., & Lin, B. (2012). Government auditing and corruption control: Evidence from China’s provincial panel data. China Journal of Accounting Research, 5(2), 163–186.
Masyitoh, R. D., Wardhani, R., & Setyaningrum, D. (2015). Pengaruh opini audit, temuan audit, dan tindak lanjut hasil audit terhadap persepsi korupsi pada pemerintah daerah tingkat II tahun [Conference paper].
Reichborn-Kjennerud, K., González-Díaz, B., Bracci, E., Carrington, T., Hathaway, J., Jeppesen, K. K., & Steccolini, I. (2019). SAIs work against corruption in Scandinavian, South-European and African countries: An institutional analysis. The British Accounting Review, 51(5), 100842.
Transparency International Indonesia. (2023). Indeks persepsi korupsi 2022: Korupsi, konflik dan keamanan.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Pasal 3 (1999).
Wanto, M., Meitiana, & Harinie, L. T. (2023). How dedication to the inspectorate of Central Kalimantan Province affects the competence and ethics of internal government supervisory apparatus? Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Administrasi Publik, 13(1), 383–392.
