Traditional Measurement Units of the Dayak Desa in Rice and Paddy Transactions: Conversion to the Modern Metric System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52300/jemba.v6i1.25245Keywords:
Traditional Measurement System, Ethnometrology, Commodity Money, Rural Economy, Market IntegrationAbstract
This study examines the traditional measurement system used by the Dayak Desa community in rice and paddy transactions, with a focus on its cultural significance and conversion into modern metric units. In this community, rice is not only a staple commodity but also functions as a socio-economic instrument embedded in cultural practices, including barter systems, customary obligations, and daily exchanges. The persistence of traditional measurement units—gatang, mok, and kulak—reflects the integration of economic activities with local knowledge and cultural values. This research employs a qualitative descriptive approach supported by simple quantitative analysis. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and documentation involving customary leaders, farmers, and local traders in Sintang Regency, West Kalimantan. Quantitative measurements were conducted using digital scales to determine the conversion of traditional units into kilograms and liters. Data analysis was carried out using the interactive model of Miles and Huberman, combined with empirical averaging techniques for measurement conversion. The findings reveal that the traditional measurement system is structured hierarchically according to transaction scale, where gatang is used for small quantities, mok for medium transactions, and kulak for large volumes. Empirical results indicate that one gatang is equivalent to approximately 0.20 kilograms (0.25 liters), one mok to 0.25 kilograms (0.30 liters), and one kulak to 2.5 kilograms (3 liters). These results demonstrate that traditional measurement practices possess internal consistency and can be reliably converted into standardized metric units. The study contributes to the literature by integrating ethnometrology and economic perspectives, highlighting how traditional measurement systems can coexist with modern standards. Practically, the conversion framework reduces information asymmetry and enhances fairness in market transactions. The study concludes that preserving traditional measurement systems while enabling their compatibility with modern metrics is essential for sustaining cultural identity and improving economic integration in rural communities
Downloads
References
Adu-Gyamfi, G., & Adjei, E. (2019). Indigenous knowledge systems and sustainable development: The role of local measurement practices. Sustainability, 11(5), 1345–1358.
Alesina, A., Harnoss, J., & Rapoport, H. (2016). Birthplace diversity and economic prosperity. Journal of Economic Growth, 21(2), 101–138.
Appadurai, A. (1986). The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Boissinot, J., & Franks, J. (2021). Market integration and information asymmetry in agricultural markets. Journal of Development Economics, 152, 102689.
Chaudhuri, B. (2015). Indigenous knowledge systems and their role in sustainable development. Journal of Human Ecology, 50(2), 123–130.
D’Ambrosio, U. (2016). Ethnomathematics and its implications for education and cultural preservation. Journal of Mathematics and Culture, 10(1), 1–15.
Geertz, C. (1978). The bazaar economy: Information and search in peasant marketing. American Economic Review, 68(2), 28–32.
Kalsum, U., & Nurhamsyah, N. (2019). Traditional measurement systems in Dayak communities: Cultural and economic perspectives. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 89–98.
Marzuki, M. (2022). Standardization of measurement systems and its impact on farmers’ bargaining power. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 20(2), 101–110.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
Nuryakin, C., & Maryati, S. (2020). Informal economy and market efficiency in developing countries. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 12(2), 150–162.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Putri, R., & Widodo, A. (2020). Ethnomathematics in traditional measurement systems: Integration into formal education. Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(2), 145–156.
Rahayu, S., & Nugroho, A. (2021). Traditional markets and price formation: Evidence from rural Indonesia. Journal of Asian Economics, 75, 101324.
Scott, J. C. (2017). Against the grain: A deep history of the earliest states. Yale University Press.
Sihombing, P., & Lestari, D. (2019). Agricultural commercialization and rural transformation in Indonesia. World Development Perspectives, 15, 100135.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). The contributions of the economics of information to twentieth century economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1441–1478.
Suryahadi, A., & Hadiwidjaja, G. (2021). Rural development and inequality in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 57(2), 197–224.
Veronica, V., Satriawan, B., & Dewi, R. (2022). Investment opportunity set and capital structure decisions. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 26(3), 210–222.
Zain, M., Nurhamsyah, N., & Kalsum, U. (2021). Ethnomathematics in Dayak traditional measurement systems. Journal of Mathematics and Culture, 15(1), 33–47.
Zakiyah, W., & Giovanni, J. (2024). Analisis Pengaruh Desentralisasi Fiskal, Investasi, dan Kinerja Keuangan Daerah Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Kemiskinan Di Provinsi Tengah Kalimantan. Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 18(1), 72-88.
Zhang, X., & Hu, D. (2020). Smallholder farmers and market participation: Evidence from developing economies. Food Policy, 95, 101936.
