Analysis of Flood Vulnerability using Geographic Information Systems in the Kahayan Watershed, Gunung Mas District, Central Kalimantan

Analisis Tingkat Kerawanan Banjir Menggunakan Sistem Informasi Geografis Pada DAS Kahayan Kabupaten Gunung Mas, Kalimantan Tengah

Authors

  • Hendrik Segah Department of Forestry, University of Palangka Raya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8306-5085
  • Alfredo Liano Department of Forestry, University of Palangka Raya
  • Santosa Yulianto Department of Forestry, University of Palangka Raya
  • Setiarno Setiarno Department of Forestry, University of Palangka Raya
  • Yanciluk Yanciluk Department of Forestry, University of Palangka Raya

Keywords:

Floods, Geographic Information System, Watersheds

Abstract

This study aims to determined the level of flood vulnerability and most dominant factors that cause flood vulnerability in the Kahayan watershed, Gunung Mas District in Central Kalimantan. This study used a quantitative method by looking at the effect of each flood parameter to determine the level of flood vulnerability or vulnerable areas in the Kahayan watershed. The results are based on research carried out in the Kahayan watershed which has 4 levels of flood vulnerability classification: low vulnerability, medium vulnerability, high vulnerability, and very high vulnerability. The high level of flood vulnerability was the largest area with an area of ​​568.146 ha or 65,25% of the Kahayan watershed area of ​​Gunung Mas District as a whole, the medium vulnerability level was 185.634 ha (21,32%), very high vulnerability level was 61,716 ha (7,09 %), and low vulnerability was the area with the smallest area of ​​55.231 ha (6,34%) of the total area of ​​the Kahayan watershed in this district. The sub-districts with the highest area at a very high level of flood susceptibility were Tewah sub-district and Kurun sub-district. The most dominant factor that causes flood vulnerability in the Kahayan watershed area of Gunung Mas District was the slope that reaches 0-8% which was included in the flat category, with 3 land criteria, namely floodplain areas, river border areas, and basin areas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asdak, C. 2010. Hidrologi dan Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Darmawan K., Hani’ah, Andri S., 2017. Analisis Tingkat Kerawanan Banjir Di Kabupaten Sampang Menggunakan Metode Overlay Dengan Scoring Berbasis Sistem Informasi Geografis. Jurnal Geodesi UNDIP, 6 (1), 31-40.

Ginting, S. 2021. Analisis Curah Hujan Penyebab Banjir Bandang Di Ujung Berung, Bandung. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil, Vol. 2, No. 2. E-ISSN: 2715-7296

Nisarto, F. 2016. Pemetaan Kerawanan Banjir Daerah Aliran Sungai Tangka. Skripsi. Fakultas Kehutanan. Universitas Hasanuddin. Makassar.

Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Pengendalian Daerah Aliran Sungai dan Hutan Lindung Nomor:P.3/PDASHL/SET/KUM.1/7/2018. Tentang : Petunjuk Teknis Penyusunan Data Spasial Lahan Kritis

Pratomo, A.J. 2008. Analisis Kerentanan Banjir di Daerah Aliran Sungai Sengkarang Kabupaten Pekalongan Provinsi Jawa Tengah dengan Bantuan Sistem Informasi Geografis. Skripsi. Fakultas Geografi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Surakarta.

Sholahuddin, M. 2015. SIG Untuk Memetakan Daerah Banjir Dengan Metode Skoring Dan Pembobotan (Studi Kasus Kabupaten Jepara). Fakultas Ilmu Komputer. Universitas Dian Nuswantoro Semarang. Semarang

Tamrin, Zulfan S., Zofyan H. Siregar. 2018. Analisis Kegiatan Penambangan Pasir – Batu Terhadap Erosi, Kualitas Air dan Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat di Sekitar Sungai Indragiri. Jurnal Photon Universitas Riau, Vol. 8 No. 2.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-01

How to Cite

Segah, H., Liano, A., Yulianto, S., Setiarno, S., & Yanciluk, Y. (2022). Analysis of Flood Vulnerability using Geographic Information Systems in the Kahayan Watershed, Gunung Mas District, Central Kalimantan: Analisis Tingkat Kerawanan Banjir Menggunakan Sistem Informasi Geografis Pada DAS Kahayan Kabupaten Gunung Mas, Kalimantan Tengah. Journal of Peat Science and Innovation, 1(1), 16–25. Retrieved from https://e-journal.upr.ac.id/index.php/jpsi/article/view/5541