PUBLICATION ETHICS

Ethics

Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Publication decisions

The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Manuscripts may be rejected by the editorial office if it is felt that the work was not carried out within an ethical framework. Inderscience Publishers adheres to the principles outlined by COPE – Committee on Publication Ethics. Authors who are concerned about the editorial process may refer to COPE.

Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

The jurnal review using double blind review. Both reviewers will reviewed the same manuscript and the decision will be announced after all of reviewers give the evaluation.

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

It is basically author’s duty to only submit a manuscript that is free from plagiarism and academically malpractices. The editor, however, double checks each article before its publication. The first step is to check plagiarism against offline database developed by Jejak Research Centre and, secondly, against as much as possible online databases. Base on the online databases, the plagiarism percentage that allowed is no more than 20 percent.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Etika

Pernyataan etika kami didasarkan pada Pedoman Praktik Terbaik COPE untuk Editor Jurnal.

Keputusan publikasi Editor bertanggung jawab untuk memutuskan artikel mana yang diserahkan ke jurnal yang harus diterbitkan. Editor dapat dipandu oleh kebijakan dewan redaksi jurnal dan dibatasi oleh persyaratan hukum yang berlaku terkait pencemaran nama baik, pelanggaran hak cipta, dan plagiarisme. Editor dapat berunding dengan editor atau pengulas lain dalam membuat keputusan ini.

 Adil

Seorang editor setiap saat mengevaluasi naskah berdasarkan konten intelektualnya tanpa memandang ras, jenis kelamin, orientasi seksual, kepercayaan agama, asal etnis, kewarganegaraan, atau filosofi politik penulis. Naskah dapat ditolak oleh kantor redaksi jika dianggap bahwa pekerjaan tersebut tidak dilakukan dalam kerangka etika. Inderscience Publishers mematuhi prinsip-prinsip yang digariskan oleh COPE – Komite Etika Publikasi. Penulis yang khawatir tentang proses editorial dapat merujuk ke COPE.

Kerahasiaan

Editor dan staf editorial tidak boleh mengungkapkan informasi apa pun tentang naskah yang diserahkan kepada siapa pun selain penulis yang bersangkutan, pengulas, calon pengulas, penasihat editorial lain, dan penerbit, sebagaimana mestinya.

Pengungkapan dan konflik kepentingan

Materi yang tidak dipublikasikan yang diungkapkan dalam naskah yang diserahkan tidak boleh digunakan dalam penelitian editor sendiri tanpa persetujuan tertulis dari penulis.

Kerahasiaan

Semua naskah yang diterima untuk ditinjau harus diperlakukan sebagai dokumen rahasia. Naskah tersebut tidak boleh diperlihatkan atau didiskusikan dengan orang lain kecuali jika diizinkan oleh editor.

Standar Objektivitas

Ulasan harus dilakukan secara objektif. Kritik pribadi terhadap penulis tidak pantas. Para penilai harus menyatakan pandangan mereka dengan jelas disertai argumen yang mendukung.

Sumber Pengakuan

Peninjau harus mengidentifikasi karya terbitan relevan yang belum dikutip oleh penulis. Setiap pernyataan bahwa suatu observasi, derivasi, atau argumen telah dilaporkan sebelumnya harus disertai dengan kutipan yang relevan. Peninjau juga harus memberi tahu editor tentang adanya kesamaan substansial atau tumpang tindih antara naskah yang sedang dipertimbangkan dan setiap makalah terbitan lain yang diketahuinya secara pribadi.

Pengungkapan dan Konflik Kepentingan

Informasi atau ide istimewa yang diperoleh melalui tinjauan sejawat harus dijaga kerahasiaannya dan tidak digunakan untuk keuntungan pribadi. Peninjau tidak boleh mempertimbangkan naskah yang mengandung konflik kepentingan yang timbul dari hubungan atau koneksi kompetitif, kolaboratif, atau lainnya dengan penulis, perusahaan, atau lembaga mana pun yang terkait dengan makalah tersebut.

Tugas Penulis

Standar pelaporan

Penulis laporan penelitian asli harus menyajikan laporan akurat tentang pekerjaan yang dilakukan serta diskusi objektif tentang signifikansinya. Data dasar harus disajikan secara akurat dalam makalah. Sebuah makalah harus berisi detail dan referensi yang cukup untuk memungkinkan orang lain meniru karya tersebut. Pernyataan yang menipu atau tidak akurat merupakan perilaku yang tidak etis dan tidak dapat diterima.

Orisinalitas dan Plagiarisme

Penulis harus memastikan bahwa mereka telah menulis karya yang sepenuhnya asli, dan jika penulis telah menggunakan karya dan/atau kata-kata orang lain, pastikan bahwa karya dan/atau kata-kata tersebut telah dikutip dengan tepat. Pada dasarnya, tugas penulis adalah hanya mengirimkan naskah yang bebas dari plagiarisme dan kecurangan akademis. Namun, editor akan memeriksa ulang setiap artikel sebelum dipublikasikan. Langkah pertama adalah memeriksa plagiarisme terhadap basis data offline yang dikembangkan oleh Jejak Research Centre dan, kedua, terhadap sebanyak mungkin basis data online. Berdasarkan basis data online, persentase plagiarisme yang diperbolehkan tidak lebih dari 20 persen.

Publikasi Berganda

Berlebihan, atau Bersamaan Seorang penulis pada umumnya tidak boleh menerbitkan naskah yang pada dasarnya menguraikan penelitian yang sama di lebih dari satu jurnal atau publikasi utama. Mengirimkan naskah yang sama ke lebih dari satu jurnal secara bersamaan merupakan perilaku penerbitan yang tidak etis dan tidak dapat diterima.