Mengukur Kesiapan Guru Selama Pelaksanaan Hybrid Learning di SD Strada Van Lith II
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37304/jpips.v15i2.11977Keywords:
Teacher Readiness, Hybrid Learning, Covid 19Abstract
Online education is growing rapidly due to the Covid 19 pandemic. For almost three years this pandemic is still ongoing, so the world of education has also begun to transform and innovate to be able to provide the best service for students and teachers. Currently, many schools have started to use technology in learning, one of which is using hybrid learning. Thus, teacher readiness is an important aspect in dealing with any changes or new situations. Especially in an era like this, it is very important for us to be able to see the extent to which teachers are prepared to deal with it. Various scales for measuring teacher readiness have been developed, one of which is the Teacher Readiness for Online Learning Measure (TROLM) Communication self-efficacy (CSE), Institutional support (IS), Self-directed learning (SDL) scale, Learning transfer self-efficacy (LTSE). The researcher used a sample of 19 SD Strada Van Lith II teachers with the Non-Probability Sampling technique. Questionnaires were distributed to all respondents via google form in the hope of getting results that answered the research objectives by using a Likert scale to minimize errors. The results of this study found that the teacher's overall readiness had an effect on the implementation of hybrid learning by utilizing technology
Downloads
References
Ackerman, A. S. (2008). Hybrid Learning in Higher Education: Engagement Strategies. College & University Media Review, 14(1), 145–158. http://ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=44881355&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5
Fauzan, & Arifin, F. (2017). Hybrid Learning sebagai Alternatif Model Pembelajaran Fauzan , Fatkhul Hybrid Learning sebagai Alternatif Model Pembelajaran. Seminar Nasional Profesionalisme Guru Di Era Digital, November 2017, 247–252.
Hanif, M. (2019). Strategi Pengembangan Program Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam Di Perguruan Tinggi Islam. Andragogi : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Agama Islam, 1(2), 30. https://doi.org/10.33474/ja.v1i2.4977
Hediansah, D., & Surjono, H. (2020). Hybrid Learning Development to Improve Teacher Learning Management. JKTP: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.17977/um038v3i12019p001
Ni’mah, S., Hasan, N., & Wiyono, D. F. (2021). VICRATINA : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Volume 6 Nomor 4 Tahun 2021 e-ISSN: 2087 – 0678X. VICRATINA: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(3), 53–61.
Phan, T. T. N., & Dang, L. T. T. (2017). Teacher Readiness for Online Teaching: A Critical Review*. Phan, T. T. N., & Dang, L. T. T. (2017). Teacher Readiness for Online Teaching: A Critical Review. International Journal Open Distance E-Learn. IJODeL, 3(1), 1– 16., 3(1), 1–16.
Sharma, R. C. (2021). Hybrid Learning in Educational System: A Ray of Hope during Covid-19 Pandemic. August, 30.
Sumandiyar, A., Husain, M. N., Sumule G, M., Nanda, I., & Fachruddin, S. (2021). The effectiveness of hybrid learning as instructional media amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi (Indonesian Journal of Communications Studies), 5(3), 651–664. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v5i3.3850
UNESCO. (2020). COVID-19 response: Hybrid Learning as a key element in ensuring continued learning. Unesco, 2(December), 35–52.
Wong, A. T. T. (2008). 5i: A design framework for hybrid learning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5169 LNCS, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85170-7_13
Tian, L. Q. (2011). Design and Application of Hybrid Learning Platform Based on Joomla. Advances in Computer Science and Education, 549-556.
Yustina, Y., Syafii, W., &Vebrianto, R. (2020). The Effects of Blended Learning and Project
Based Learning on Pre- Service Biology Teachers’ Creative Thinking through Online Learning in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Indonesian Journal of Science Education, 9(3), 408-420.
Barron, M., Cobo, C., Ciarrusta, I, & Najar, A. (2021). What is Hybrid Learning? How can
countries get it right? Retrieved from: https://blogs.worldbank.org/education/ what-hybrid-learning-how-can-countriesget-it-right
Erni Nurjanah, M. R. (2021). Penerapan Pembelajaran Daring di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Didactical Mathematics, 50.
Kuntarto, E. (2017). Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Daring Dalam Perkuliahan. Journal Indonesian Language Education and Literature Vol. 3, No. 1, Desember 2017, 102.
Pohan, A. E. (2020). Konsep pembelajaran daring berbasis Ilmiah. Purwodadi: CV Sarnu Untung.
Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H., & Own, Z. Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers and Education, 55(3), 1080–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.004
Rizki Tiara, D., & Pratiwi, E. (2020). Pentingnya Mengukur Kesiapan Guru Sebagai Dasar Pembelajaran Daring Di Lembaga PAUD. 04(2).
Wangid, M. N., Mustadi, A., Erviana, V. Y., & Arifin, S. (2014). Kesiapan Guru SD dalam Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Tematik-Integratif pada Kurikulum 2013 di DIY kesiapan guru sd dalam pelaksanaan pembelajaran tematik-integratif pada kurikulum 2013 di diy The Study on The Elementary School Teachers Readiness in Implementing Thematic-Integrative Teaching and Learning in Curriculum 2013, Yogyakarta. In Jurnal Prima Edukasia (Vol. 2, Issue 2).
Saragih, S., Markus, T., Rhian, P., & Setiawan, S. (2021). Eksplorasi Kesiapan Dosen dan Mahasiswa Menjalani Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 09/01.
Hung, M. L. (2016). Teacher readiness for online learning: Scale development and teacher perceptions. Computers and Education, 94, 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.012
Nurrahmawati, A., & dkk. (2021). Menjadi Guru Profesional dan Inovatif dalam Menghadapi Pandemi (S. Priwantoro, F. Setyawan, U. Khasanah, & D. Astuti, Eds.). UAD Press.
Rusdiana, A., & Nasihudin. (2021). Kesiapan Manajemen Akreditasi Institusi Perguruan Tinggi. Pusat Penelitian dan Penerbitan UIN SGD Bandung.
Wijaya, D. (2019). Manajemen Pendidikan Inklusif Sekolah Dasar (Pertama). Kencana.
Bandur, A. (2013). Penelitian Kuantitatif: Metodologi, desain, dan teknik analisis data kuantitatif
dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Deepublish Press.
Bandur, A. (2013). Penelitian Kuantitatif: Metodologi, desain, dan teknik analisis data
kuantitatif dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Deepublish Press.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006a). Multivariate Data
Analysis. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Manning, M., & Don Munro. (2006). Th e Survey Researcher’s SPSS Cookbook. French Forest, NSW
Australia: Pearson & SprintPrint.
Nardi, P. M. (2003). Doing Survey Research: A guide to quantitative methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using the SPSS program.
New York: McGraw Hill.
Sugiyono. (2010). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugiyono, P. D. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta Bandung.
Trifenanto, J., & Raymond, M. (n.d.). PENGUKURAN KETERAMPILAN Sosial Siswa Pada Dimensi Emosional Di Sekolah Bpk Penabur V Jakarta [Unpublished]. 6.
