ANALYSIS OF STUDENT’S SATISFACTION LEVEL TOWARDS LEARNING METHODS OF LECTURERS IN INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 4.0 : A SURVEY OF HIGHER STUDENT IN FIRST SEMESTER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37304/jptm.v2i2.2450Keywords:
Keywords: student’s satisfaction level, lecturer learning method, industrial revolution 4.0, Higer EducationAbstract
This study aims to analyze the level of student satisfaction on learning methods that conducted by lecturers who teach in industrial revolution 4.0 era, especially higher student first semester at Musamus University. The data obtained from 120 respondents first semester students, spread across several majors in Musamus University. This research is a quantitative descriptive study which uses a questionnaire for data collection which is carried out through online survey. Data tabulation is calculated using a Likert scale to obtain a percentage of student satisfaction levels. The results obtained are a relationship between student satisfaction with the learning methods carried out by lecturers in terms of time discipline, mastery of the material, delivery of material, assessment and evaluation during the lecture process. The results of the analysis of the performance of lecturers perceived by students of the satisfaction t in the era of learning industry 4.0 through learning methods carried out from various aspects and factors in the lecture process have a positive effect. Total average from three indicators are 81% categorized student satisfied for learning method yhat conducted by lecturer in Musamus university but still need to improve for evaluation and assessment.
Downloads
References
Al-Sheeb, B., Hamouda, A. M., & Abdella, G. M. (2018). Investigating Determinants of Student Satisfaction in the First Year of College in a Public University in the State of Qatar. Education Research International, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7194106
Aziz Hussin, A. (2018). Education 4.0 Made Simple: Ideas For Teaching. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(3), 92. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.92
Bahri, S., & Aswan, Z. (2006). Strategi Belajar Mengajar (Jakarta). Rineka Cipta.
Basir Paly. (2014). Tingkat Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Kinerja Proses Belajar Mengajar (Pbm) Dosen. Jurnal Al Hikmah, XV(2), 250–262.
Bigné, E., Moliner, M. A., & Sánchez, J. (2003). Perceived quality and satisfaction in multiservice organisations: The case of Spanish public services. Journal of Services Marketing, 17(4), 420–442. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040310482801
Gee, N. C. (2018). The impact of lecturers’ competencies on students’ satisfaction. Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 1(2), 74–86.
Hyun, J., Ediger, R., & Lee, D. (2017). Students’ Satisfaction on Their Learning Process in Active Learning and Traditional Classrooms. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 108–118.
Ibrahim, A. B., Mohamad, F., Rom, K. B. M., & Shahrom, S. M. (2013). Identifying Strategies Adopted by Novice Lecturers in the Initial Years of Teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90(InCULT 2012), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.059
Marpaung, D. N., Siregar, L. F., & Pongkendek, J. J. (2019). The development of innovative learning material integrated with environmental activities to improve student learning outcomes on electrolyte and nonelectrolyte solution. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 343(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012218
Motefakker, N. (2016). The Study of the Level of Satisfaction of the Students of the Faculty of Social Sciences with Welfare Services of Imam Khomeini International University of Qazvin. Procedia Economics and Finance, 36(16), 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(16)30052-1
Nurvitasari, E., Susanto, R., Nur’aini, K. D., & Meirista, E. (2018). The Utilization of Edmodo in Blended Learning. 226(Icss), 1427–1434. https://doi.org/10.2991/icss-18.2018.301
Pongkendek, J. J., Parlindungan, J. Y., & Marpaung, D. N. (2019). Effectiveness of the application of team games tournament cooperative learning model (TGT) to improve learning outcomes of students of class xi science 1 SMA Frater Makassar in the principal material of salt hydrolysis. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 343(1), 0–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012228
Prihandoko, L. A., Tembang, Y., Marpaung, D. N., & Rahman, F. (2019). English language competence for tourism sector in supporting socio-economic development in Merauke: A Survey Study. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 343(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012170
Rahman, N. A. A., Hussein, N., & Aluwi, A. H. (2015). Satisfaction on Blended Learning in a Public Higher Education Institution: What Factors Matter? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211(September), 768–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.107
S1877042813049781. (n.d.).
Santini, F. de O., Ladeira, W. J., Sampaio, C. H., & da Silva Costa, G. (2017). Student satisfaction in higher education: a meta-analytic study. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 27(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2017.1311980
Setiawan, B. S. (2013). Peran Sentral Kinerja Dosen Dalam Meningkatkan Kepuasan Mahasiswa Stia-Lan Bandung. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 10(3), 530–550. https://doi.org/10.31113/JIA.V10I3.23
Shurair, A. S. A., & Pokharel, S. (2019). Stakeholder’s perception of service quality: a case in Qatar. Quality Assurance in Education, 27(4), 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-05-2017-0023
Sugyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sulastri, T. (2017). Analisis Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Kinerja Dosen. Optimal: Jurnal Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Islam “45” Bekasi, 10(2), 167–184.
Xiao, J., & Wilkins, S. (2015). The effects of lecturer commitment on student perceptions of teaching quality and student satisfaction in Chinese higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(1), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2014.992092
