Efektifitas Penyelesaian Perkara Melalui E-Court Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Pada Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Palangka Raya

Authors

  • Wiwik Krisnawati Magister Sains Manajemen FEB UPR
  • Danes Jaya Negara Magister Sains Manajemen FEB UPR
  • Luluk Tri Harinie Magister Sains Manajemen FEB UPR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37304/ej.v4i1.7951

Keywords:

Effectiveness, Case settlement, E-court, State Administrative Court, Competence of Human Resources

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to find out how the case settlement process was before the implementation of E-Court at the Palangka Raya State Administrative Court, to find out how the case settlement process was after the implementation of E-Court during the covid 19 pandemic at the Palangka Raya State Administrative Court, and to For find out what are the obstacles faced after implementing E-Court in settling cases and the efforts made by the Palangkaraya State Administrative Court to overcome these obstacles. This type of research is descriptive research with a qualitative approach, to obtain empirical data and information. The results of the study revealed that: 1) The case settlement process before the implementation of E-Court at the Palangkaraya State Administrative Court did not run effectively because it was still manual, meaning that justice seekers had to come directly to the Court's office from the registration of claims to decisions, so this was not appropriate with the principle of administering justice in a simple, fast and low cost manner; 2) The case settlement process after the implementation of E-Court during the covid - 19 pandemic at the Palangka Raya State Administrative Court is running effectively because it is no longer manual but online so that it can be done from anywhere without the need to come to the Court office thereby reducing face-to-face and avoiding crowds, the process is also simpler, faster and cheaper, besides that the performance of the court apparatus has increased, which means that the competency of the apparatus is very good; and 3) Obstacles encountered during the implementation of E-Court at the Palangkaraya State Administrative Court can be overcome properly by making various efforts to overcome them so that the implementation of E-Court continues to run effectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Administrator. 2015. Sejarah Pengadilan. Ptun-Palangkaraya.Go.Id. https://www.ptun-palangkaraya.go.id/hal-sejarah-pengadilan.html

Al Swelmiyeen, I., & Al-Nuemat, A. 2017. Facebook e-court: Online justice for online disputes. Computer Law and Security Review, 33(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2016.11.006

Alam, S. O. 2021. Kapan COVID-19 Masuk ke Indonesia? Begini Kronologinya. Detikhealth. https://health.detik.com/berita-detikhealth/d-5781536/kapan-covid-19-masuk-ke-indonesia-begini-kronologinya

Anam, A. Z. 2022. Azas Penyelenggaraan Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung. https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/glosarium-hukum/1953-asas-penyelenggaraan-kekuasaan-kehakiman#:~:text=Asas Penyelenggaraan Kekuasaan Kehakiman%3A,yang diatur dengan undang-undang.

Anwar, H., Niswaty, R., & Saleh, S. 2017. Pelayanan Penerbitan Buku Pelaut Berbasis Online. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 7(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.26858/jiap.v7i1.3435

Arsyad, A. 2015. Media pembelajaran. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Atikah, I. 2018. Implementasi E-Court dan Dampaknya Terhadap Advokat Dalam Proses. 14.

Azizah. 2022. Ketua MA nyatakan tahun 2021 merupakan tahun terbaik sepanjang sejarah berdirinya Mahkamah Agung dalam penyelesaian perkara. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/id/berita/5096/ketua-ma-nyatakan-tahun-2021-merupakan-tahun-terbaik-sepanjang-sejarah-berdirinya-mahkamah-agung-dalam-penyelesaian-perkara#:~:text=Dari jumlah beban tersebut Mahkamah,seratus tujuh puluh lima) perkara.

Berperkara, E., Elektronik, S., Di, C., Pandemi, M., Kaimuddin, K., & Kasim, A. J. (2021). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF JURISDICTION ELECTRONICALLY ( E- COURT ) DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ( Polewali Religious Court Study Class 1B ). 2, 101–120.

Bintoro, R. W., Maryono, A. S., & Mutiara, L. S. 2020. Perbandingan E-Court Dan Sidang Konvensional Dalam Mewujudkan Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pengembangan Sumber Daya Perdesaan Dan Kearifan Lokal Berkelanjutan X, 340–346.

Dalle, J., Siyoto, S., Astika, N. D., Negara, D. J., Chandra, T., & Anam, K. 2020. Moderating role of IT adoption and mechanism of dynamic capabilities on Indonesian pharmaceutical firms performance. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(9), 982–992. https://doi.org/10.31838/srp.2020.9.142

Darwis, M., Arhas, S. H., & Nasrullah, M. 2021. Online Learning Based on the Borneo E-Learning Application (A Study of Student Satisfaction Analysis in the Use of the BEL Application at the Universitas Borneo Tarakan). International Joined Conference on Social Science (ICSS 2021), 603(Icss), 576–581.

Dzulfaroh, A. N. 2021. Hari Ini dalam Sejarah: WHO Tetapkan Covid-19 sebagai Pandemi Global. Kompas.Com. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2021/03/11/104000165/hari-ini-dalam-sejarah--who-tetapkan-covid-19-sebagai-pandemi-global?page=all

Gracia, Fae Ocarina, M., & Sanjaya, R. 2021. Eksistensi E-Court untuk Mewujudkan Efisiensi dan Efektivitas pada Sistem Peradilan Indonesia Di Tengah Covid-19. Jurnal Syntax Transformation, 2(4), 496–507. https://doi.org/10.46799/jst.v2i4.253

Guo, M. 2021. Internet court’s challenges and future in China. Computer Law & Security Review, 40, 105522. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLSR.2020.105522

Hayati, R. S. R. R., & Hayati, M. 2021. Sistem E-Court Dalam Pelaksanaan Peradilan Di Indonesia Pada Masa Pandemi Covid - 19. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Tambun Bungai, 6(2), 125–143. https://journal.stihtb.ac.id/index.php/jihtb/article/download/203/76

Jaya Hairi, P. 2011. Antara Prinsip Peradilan Sederhana, Cepatdan Berbiaya Ringan dan Gagasan Pembatasan Perkara Kasasi. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 02(01), 151–178. http://www.tempointeraktif.com/hg/nasional/2004/08/09/brk,20040809-28,id.html,

Liza. 2021. Pengaruh teknologi digital dalam dunia Peradialan. Pengadilan Agama Lubuk Sikaping. https://www.pa-lubuksikaping.go.id/berita/berita-terkini/475-pengaruh-teknologi-digital-dalam-dunia-peradilan

Mahkamah Agung RI. 2019. Buku Panduan E-Court. Jakarta: T.T, 7.

Mutiarasari, K. A. 2022. Pengertian Pandemi Covid-19, Statusnya di Indonesia Diperpanjang Jokowi. Detiknews. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5881903/pengertian-pandemi-covid-19-statusnya-di-indonesia-diperpanjang-jokowi

Negara, D. J., & Kristinae, V. 2018. Pengaruh Teknologi dan Inovasi dalam Persaingan Traditional Food di Kalimantan Tengah. JMD: Jurnal Riset Manajemen & Bisnis Dewantara, 2(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.26533/jmd.v2i1.347

Niswaty, R., Febrianti, K., Sakawati, H., & Arhas, S. H. 2018. Efektivitas Media e-Court di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Makassar.

Nofriandy, P. 2018. Ketua Mahkamah Agung luncurkan aplikasi E-Court. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/id/berita/3087/ketua-mahkamah-agung-luncurkan-aplikasi-e-c0urt

Prof. Dr. A. Muri Yusuf, M. P. (480 C.E.). Metode Penelitian: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Penelitian Gabungan. Kencana.

Romney, M. B. 2019. Sistem Informasi Akutansi. Salemba Empat.

Rosmana, Fitri, dkk. 2020. Pelaksanaan Sistem E-Court Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata Oleh Advokat Di Kota Palembang. Diss. Sriwijaya University.

Rozy Alfian Mukthar, S.H., M. K. 2020. Mahkamah Agung Menuju Lembaga Peradilan Modern berbasis E-Court. Pengadilan Agama Bawean. https://www.pa-bawean.go.id/hubungi-kami/arsip/arsip-artikel/217-mahkamah-agung-menuju-lembaga-peradilan-modern-berbasis-ecourt

Sanjaya, M. 2020. YUME: Journal of Management Digitalisasi Pengadilan dalam Penyelesaian Perkara. YUME: Journal If Management, 3(2), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.37531/yum.v11.12

Sihite, Y. A., & Hamzah Marpaung, D. S. 2022. Efektivitas E-Court Sebagai Sarana Penyelesaian Sengketa Di tengah Pandemi Covid-19 Di Indonesia. Widya Yuridika, 5(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v5i1.2495

Spencer Lyle M and Spencer Signe M. 2012. Competence at work models for superior performance. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Sugiyono, D. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Tindakan.

Suharsimi, A. 2010. Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Sung, H. C. 2020. Can Online Courts Promote Access to Justice? A Case Study of the Internet Courts in China. Computer Law & Security Review, 39, 105461. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLSR.2020.105461

Willey, R. R. 1997. Practical Design and Production of Optical Thin Films. In Optical Engineering (Vol. 36, Issue 7). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.601411

Zuse Marafa Yunianto, S. 2019. Selayang pandang mengenai inovasi E-Court dari Mahkamah Agung Indonesia. Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Palangka Raya. http://www.pta-palangkaraya.go.id/berita/berita-pengadilan-agama/buntok/846-selayang-pandang-mengenai-inovasi-e-court-dari-mahkamah-agung-republik-indonesia

Downloads

Published

2022-12-18

How to Cite

Wiwik Krisnawati, Danes Jaya Negara, & Luluk Tri Harinie. (2022). Efektifitas Penyelesaian Perkara Melalui E-Court Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Pada Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Palangka Raya. Edunomics Journal, 4(1), 46–70. https://doi.org/10.37304/ej.v4i1.7951