Analysis of Beginning Writing Difficulties in Indonesian Language Learning for Grade II of Kepek State Elementary School in the 2023/2024 Academic Year

Authors

  • Indah Dwi Febriyanti IKIP PGRI Wates
  • Yulia Palupi IKIP PGRI Wates

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52850/jpn.v25i2.15633

Keywords:

Difficulty analysis, beginning writing, grade II students

Abstract

This study aims to identify and analyze the difficulties faced by grade II students of SDN Kepek in writing beginning in learning Indonesian Language, and to find out the factors that affect students' ability to write beginning writing. The formulation of this research problem is what the difficulty of writing the beginning is like and what factors affect the difficulty of writing the beginning of grade II students in learning Indonesian Language at SDN Kepek. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach. Research site of SDN Kedek, Pengasih District, Kulon Progo Regency.

The instruments used by the researcher are observation, interviews, and documentation with the research subjects of class II students, and the researcher's informant as a supporting resource person, namely the class II homeroom teacher. The data analysis and interpretation technique uses 3 stages, namely data reduction, data presentation and conclusion drawn.

Based on the results of the research, some of the writing difficulties experienced by grade II students through their writing include: letter shapes are difficult to recognize, difficulty adjusting the height of letters, slow writing, no spaces in writing and unclear or illegible writing. Then the factors that cause difficulties in learning to write early are internal factors including weak fine motor skills, weak memory skills, and low interest in learning. Meanwhile, external factors include a lack of parental attention, a less supportive home atmosphere, the learning process at school, and the influence of technology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achrony, K. (2015). Strategi Pembelajaran Untuk Anak Disgrafia. Group Relasi Inti Media, anggota IKAPI.

Achru P, Andi. (2019). Pengembangan Minat Belajar Dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Idaarah, Vol. III, NO.2 hal 208

Agustina, E.s. (2023) “paradigma pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia dalam kurikulum Merdeka”. UPGRIS conference

Ahmadi dan Supriyanto. (2013). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Akmalia, N, dkk. (2022). Analisis Kesulitan Menulis Siswa Kelas III dalam Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris di SD Negeri Pondok Bahar 6 Kota Tangerang. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(2), 13636-13644.

Ali, M. (2020). Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia dan Sastra (BASASTRA) Di Sekolah Dasar. 3(1).

Ayu, dkk. (2021). Analisis Faktor Penyebab Kesulitan Belajar. Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan. 10(3) 1611

BSKAP Kemendikbud Ristek (2022). Capaian Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Fase A – Fase F https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/file/cp/dasmen/8.%20CP%20%Bahas 20%Indonesia.pdf

Dafit, F. (2017). Keefektifan Kemampuan Menulis Kreatif Siswa SD dengan Model Pembelajaran Multiliterasi. 5, 49–57

Damayanti. A (2022). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Kelas Rendah di SD Negeri 17 Banyuasin III. 2(1), 369– 375.

Hulwah, B dan Ahmad, M. (2022). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Menulis Permulaan pada Siswa Kelas II Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu 6(4), 7360–7367.

Jatiwuni, Aditya. (2019). Peningkatan Keterampilan Menulis Permulaan Melalui Metode Latihan (Drill). Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 8(2) 2026-2027.

Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar Kurikulum dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kemendikbudristek No. 033/H/KR/2022 https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/033_H_KR_2022-Salinan-SK Kabadan-tentang-Perubahan-SK-008-tentang-Capaian-Pembelajaran.pdf

Kholil. (2011). Al Mustawa Al Kitabi. (Aman Jordan: Dar Ash – Shofwah) hal 264

Klawon, M. V., Rabia, S. F., & Purwodjuwono, R. (2024). Analisis Kemampuan Menulis Permulaan Siswa Kelas II SD Inpres 26 Klamono Kabupaten Sorong. Trapsila: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 5(2), 18-24.

Kosasih, (2014). Strategi Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Penerbit Yrama Widya, 3–4

Kumara, Amitya (2014) Kesulitan Berbahasa Pada Anak Yogyakarta: anisius. Hal 73.

Maryani, dkk. 2018. Mobel Intervensi Gangguan Kesulitan Belajar. Yogyakarta: K-Media (Ebook)

Mashlahati, P. (2023). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Menulis Permulaan Pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 8(2), 3168-3178.

Paba, E., Noge, M. D., & Wau, M. P. (2021). Analisis Faktor - faktor Kesulitan Membaca Menulis dan Berhitung Siswa Kelas I SDI Bobawa Kecamatan Golewa Selatan Kabupaten Ngada Tahun 2020. 1.

Puspitasari, D. (2018). Panduan Pendampingan Gangguan Belajar Disgrafia. Albasil Aksara

Putri, Novia D. (2021). Peningkatan Kemampuan Menulis Permulaan dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Talking Stick Siswa Kelas I SD N 05 Padang Pasir Kota Padang, Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, Vol.5, No 2, (3211)

Slamet. (2017). Pembelajaran Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia di kelas Rendah dan Kelas Tinggi (3rd ed.). UNS PRESS hal 27

Suastika, N. (2018). Problematika Pembelajaran Membaca Dan Menulis Permulaan Di Sekolah Dasar, Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, Vol 3, No 1, (59)

Suparlan. (2020). Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar 4, (2) 245-258

Sutrisno, E. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Media Group. 29

Undang – Undang Republik Indonesia tentang SISDIKNAS no. 20 Tahun 2003, (Bandung: Fermana, 2006), hlm 83.

Widyaningrum, H. K., & Hasanudin, C. (2019). Menulis Permulaan (MMP) di Sekolah Dasar [Study of Difficulty Learning to Read Beginning Writing (MMP) in Primary School]. 8(2), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v8i2.2219

Utami, F. N. (2020). Peranan Guru Dalam Mengatasi Kesulitan Belajar Siswa SD. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Volume, 2(1), 93-101

Published

2025-01-24

How to Cite

Febriyanti, I. D. ., & Palupi, Y. . (2025). Analysis of Beginning Writing Difficulties in Indonesian Language Learning for Grade II of Kepek State Elementary School in the 2023/2024 Academic Year. Jurnal Pendidikan, 25(2), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.52850/jpn.v25i2.15633