EFFECTIVENESS OF E-FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT TO ENHANCE CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING IN STATIC FLUID

Penulis

  • Zahrotul Ula Irma SMP Negeri 1 Taman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52850/jpn.v23i2.7882

Kata Kunci:

e-formative assessment, conceptual understanding, static fluid, teacher’s feedback

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji efektivitas e-formative assessment dalam meningkatkan penguasaan konsep siswa pada materi fluida statis. Penelitian dengan metode one group pretest-posttest design ini melibatkan 30 siswa. Instrumen pretest dan posttest terdiri atas 10 soal pilihan ganda disertai alasan dengan reliabilitas 0,629 dan level kognitif dari C3-C5. Instrumen tes formatif yang diberikan terdiri atas 10 soal pilihan ganda dengan indikator dan tingkat kesulitan setara dengan pretest dan posstest. Hasil uji Wilcoxon menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata nilai posttest secara signifikan lebih tinggi daripada rata-rata nilai pretest (p=.000). Nilai effect size sebesar 0,88 menunjukkan bahwa e-formative assessment berpengaruh sedang terhadap penguasaan konsep siswa pada materi fluida statis. Salah satu faktor penentu e-formative assessment dapat meningkatkan penguasaan konsep siswa adalah adanya pemberian feedback. Melalui feedback, miskonsepsi yang dialami siswa dapat segera dibenarkan. E-formative assessment yang diberikan melalui web juga semakin efektif dalam memberikan feedback yang cepat dan tepat kepada seluruh siswa dengan beragam respon.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

Ain, N. U., Jan, S., Yasmeen, R., & Mumtaz, H. 2022. Perception of Undergraduate Medical and Health Sciences Students Regarding Online Formative Assessments During COVID-19. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 72(3), 882–886. https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v72i3.7556

Ammase, A., Siahaan, P., & Fitriani, A. 2019. Identification of junior high school students’ misconceptions on solid matter and pressure liquid substances with four tier test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022034

Andersson, C., & Palm, T. 2017. Characteristics of improved formative assessment practice. Education Inquiry, 8(2), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2016.1275185

Andrade, H. L. 2010. Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. NERA Conference Proceedings 2010, October 2010, 1–18.

Arends, R. I. 2012. Learning to Teach Ninth Rdition.

Balqis, D., Kusairi, S., & Supriana, E. 2019. Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Ilmiah pada Pembelajaran Interactive Demonstration disertai Formative Assessment. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 4(11), 1485. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i11.13010

Bazelais, P., & Doleck, T. 2018. Investigating the impact of blended learning on academic performance in a first semester college physics course. Journal of Computers in Education, 5(1), 67–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-018-0099-8

Berek, F. X., Sutopo, S., & Munzil, M. 2016. Concept enhancement of junior high school students in hydrostatic pressure and archimedes law by predict-observe-explain strategy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.6038

Buchholtz, N. F., Krosanke, N., Orschulik, A. B., & Vorhölter, K. 2018. Combining and integrating formative and summative assessment in mathematics teacher education. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 50(4), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0948-y

Buck, G. A., & Trauth-Nare, A. E. 2009. Preparing teachers to make the formative assessment process integral to science teaching and learning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(5), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9142-y

Bybee, R. 2014. Guest Editorial: The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Personal Reflections and Contemporary Implications. Science and Children, 051(08), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/sc14_051_08_10

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. 2007. Research Methods in Education (Sixth Edit). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Cruz, É., Dias, H., & Kortemeyer, G. 2011. The effect of formative assessment in brazilian university physics courses. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Fisica, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-11172011000400016

Dahalan, H. M., & Hussain, R. M. R. 2010. Development of Web-based Assessment in Teaching and Learning Management System (e-ATLMS). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 244–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.144

Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. 2014. Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119

Docktor, J. L., Strand, N. E., Mestre, J. P., & Ross, B. H. 2015. Conceptual problem solving in high school physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020106

Ediyanto, E. 2016. Siklus Prapembelajaran Model Penilaian Formatif Web-Based Pada Pembelajaran Fisika Materi Suhu Dan Kalor Untuk Siswa Smk Kelas X. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 12(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v12i2.5906

Ford-connors, E., Robertson, D. A., & Paratore, J. R. 2016. Classroom Talk as (In)Formative Assessment. 23(3).

Hindriyani, A., Kusairi, S., & Yuliati, L. 2020. Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah Rangkaian Arus Searah Pada Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Disertai Penilaian Formatif. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(9), 1237. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i9.14003

Irma, Z. U., Kusairi, S., & Yuliati, L. 2020. Penguasaan Konsep Siswa pada Materi Fluida Statis Dalam Pembelajaran STEM Disertai E-Formative Assessment. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(6), 822. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i6.13638

Irwansyah, Sukarmin, & Harjana. 2018. Analysis Profile of Student Misconceptions on the Concept of Fluid Based Instrument Three-Tier Test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1), 0–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012020

Koes-H, S., Muhardjito, M., & Wijaya, C. P. 2018. Scaffolding for solving problem in static fluid: A case study. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1923. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5019519

Köse, U. 2010. A blended learning model supported with Web 2.0 technologies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2794–2802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.417

Kusairi, S., Hardiana, H. A., Swasono, P., Suryadi, A., & Afrieni, Y. 2021. E- Formative Assessment Integration in Collaborative Inquiry: A Strategy to Enhance Students’ Conceptual Understanding in Static Fluid Concepts. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 17(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v17i1.23969

Kusairi, Sentot, Alfad, H., & Zulaikah, S. 2017. Development of web-based intelligent tutoring (iTutor) to help students learn fluid statics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10194a

Kusairi, Sentot, Rosyidah, N. D., Diyana, T. N., & Nisa, I. K. 2020. Conceptual understanding and difficulties of high school students in urban and rural areas: Case of archimedes’ principles. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2215(April). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000752

Loverude, M. E., Kautz, C. H., & Heron, P. R. L. 2003. Helping students develop an understanding of Archimedes’ principle. I. Research on student understanding. American Journal of Physics, 71(11), 1178–1187. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1607335

Mason, A., & Singh, C. 2016. Using categorization of problems as an instructional tool to help introductory students learn physics. Physics Education, 51(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/51/2/025009

Michelini, M., & Stefanel, A. 2019. Innovation in physics teaching/learning for the formative success in introductory physics for bio area degrees: The case of fluids. Upgrading Physics Education to Meet the Needs of Society, 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96163-7_10

Nutan, M. T. H., & Demps, E. L. 2014. Online assessments in pharmaceutical calculations for enhancing feedback and practice opportunities. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 6(6), 807–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2014.07.010

Romadhon, U., Sukarmin, S., & Budiawanti, S. 2021. Physics Teachers’ Perspectives on The Availability of The Integration of E-Formative Assessment in E-Learning based on Website (EFA in ELboW) during Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 5(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i1.31643

Rosyad, S., Diantoro, M., & Kusairi, S. 2021. Pengaruh Scientific Approach Berbantuan Penilaian Formatif terhadap Motivasi Belajar dan Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas XI Perempuan pada Materi Elastisitas. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(10), 1480. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i10.14134

Stull, J. C., Varnum, S. J., Ducette, J., Schiller, J., & Bernacki, M. L. 2011. The many faces of formative assessment . International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(1), 30–39.

Wagner, D. J., Carbone, E., & Lindow, A. 2014. Exploring Student Difficulties with Buoyancy. may, 357–360. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2013.pr.077

Wuttiprom, S. 2018. A comparison of students’ understanding of concepts in fluid mechanics through peer instruction and the T5 learning model. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 26(5), 20–35.

Yin, Y., Tomita, M. K., & Shavelson, R. J. 2013. Using Formal Embedded Formative Assessments Aligned with a Short-Term Learning Progression to Promote Conceptual Change and Achievement in Science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(4), 531–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.787556

Diterbitkan

2022-12-31

Cara Mengutip

Irma, Z. U. (2022). EFFECTIVENESS OF E-FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT TO ENHANCE CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING IN STATIC FLUID. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN, 23(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.52850/jpn.v23i2.7882