Morpho-Semantic Analysis of Word Formation in Abraham Lincoln’s “The Gettysburg Address”

Yulius Yosef Kasimo; Yuliana M. D' Karmel Kara

doi:10.37304/ebony.v6i2.25727

Authors

Yulius Yosef Kasimo Universitas Flores
Yuliana M. D' Karmel Kara Universitas Flores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37304/ebony.v6i2.25727

Keywords:

word formation, grammatical meaning, lexical meaning, contextual meaning

Abstract

This research analyzes word formation, including inflection, derivation, grammatical meaning, lexical meaning, contextual meaning. This research employed a qualitative approach supported by morphological and semantic theory. The study focuses on Abraham Lincoln's "Gettysburg Address" delivered in 1863. Data collected analyzes words related to inflection and derivation. It has been identified that a number of inflectional morphemes show the presence of morphemes marked by the suffixes "-s", "-d", "-ed", "-ing", "-er", "-al-" and "-re". Six derivational morphemes found in the speech sample include: -ment, -ion, un-, -ing, -ly, and -ed or -d. Inflected and derivative words exhibit a high degree of semantic interconnectedness, both in terms of their lexical meanings and the contexts in which they are employed. Abraham Lincoln sought to emphasize five key points: Change catalysts are historical, and national philosophy is crucial. Respect those who built America's foundation. Unity and dedication are crucial to fulfilling past revolutionaries' unrealized ideals. This research enhanced the understanding of morphological features and semantic categories while reinforcing the non-negotiable importance of human rights and the indispensable role of a democratic system of government. Future research may compare morpho-semantic patterns in political speeches using corpus-based or critical discourse analysis to examine persuasive functions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

DOI: 10.37304/ebony.v6i2.25727 DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.37304/ebony.v6i2.25727

Views: 0 | Downloads: 0

References

Alexiadou, A. (2019). Morphological and semantic markedness revisited: The realization of plurality across languages. Zeitschrift Fur Sprachwissenschaft, 38(1), 123–154. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2019-0004

Bale, A., Gagnon, M., & Khanjian, H. (2011). On the relationship between morphological and semantic markedness: The case of plural morphology. Morphology, 21(2), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9158-1

Bauer, L. (2003). Introducing linguistic morphology (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474464284

Bobaljik, J. D. (2012). Universals in comparative morphology: Suppletion, superlatives, and the structure of words. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.9793/elsj.32.1_185

Booij, G. (2007). The grammar of words: An introduction to linguistic morphology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226245.001.0001

Briggs, J. C. (2020). Lincoln’s speeches reconsidered. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book.72307

Cotterell, R., & Schütze, H. (2018). Joint semantic synthesis and morphological analysis of the derived word. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 6, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00003

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Research design qualitative quantitative and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.3109/08941939.2012.723954

Dewa, I., Kurnia Martini, A., & Martini, A. K. (2018). Derivational bound morpheme. International Research Journal of Management, 1–8. https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/irjmis/article/view/343

Dreisbach, D. L. (2015). Biblical language and themes in Lincoln’s Gettysburg address. Perspectives on Political Science, 44(1), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10457097.2014.955447

Fá, A. (2015). Morphology in linguistics. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 15, pp. 819–825). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.53012-7

Fionasari, R., & Saputra, E. (2024). Language and power: Analyzing discourse and communication dynamics in political and social contexts. Social Studies & Humanities Journal (SOSHUM), 1(1), 90–96. https://journal.ppipbr.com/index.php/soshum/article/download/258/240/1172

Fransisca, V. (2023). The role, function, and position of language in everyday life. Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, 3(1), 297–301. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v3i1.739

Giegerich, H. J. (2012). The morphology of -ly and the categorial status of “adverbs” in English. English Language and Linguistics, 16(3), 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674312000147

Gonnerman, L. M., Seidenberg, M. S., & Andersen, E. S. (2007). Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.323

Gwilliams, L. (2020). How the brain composes morphemes into meaning. Philosophical transactions of the royal society B: Biological Sciences, 375(1791). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0311

Hamawand, Z. (2025). Grammatical meaning. In English Lexical Semantics (pp. 25–34). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350520455.ch-3

Hasanah, R., & Habibullah, M. (2020). Analysis of lexical and contextual meaning in Raef’s song lyric of the Path album as the Holy Qur’an values. PANYONARA: Journal of English Education, 2(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.19105/panyonara.v2i1.3150

Haspelmath, M., & Sims, A. D. (2013). Understanding morphology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203776506

Hoch, B. R. (2001). 7. “Unfinished work”: The Gettysburg Address. In The Lincoln Trail in Pennsylvania: A history and guide (pp. 84–106). Pennsylvania State University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780271072227-011

Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge University Press.

Jaquess, T. J. (2017). Revolutionary fathers: Republican fatherhood and the American Revolution and early republic 1763-1814 (Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 1423). University of Mississippi. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/1423

Joullié, J. E., & Spillane, R. (2021). The language of integrative collective bargaining. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 32(3), 472–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304620981966

Joullié, J. E., Gould, A. M., Spillane, R., & Luc, S. (2021). The language of power and authority in leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101491

Khanetnok, P., Srihamongkhon, K., Daengsaewram, S., & Thabkhoontod, R. (2023). Morphology: Word formation in linguistics. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews (IJSASR), 3(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.14456/jsasr.2023.9

Kusumawardhani, P. (2023). The Analysis of functional morpheme in Hansel and Gretel short story. Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(1), 154. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v8i1.18732

LaFantasie, G. W. (2008). The Gettysburg Gospel: The Lincoln Speech That Nobody Knows, by Gabor Boritt. Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association, 29(2), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.5406/19457987.29.2.06

Latunra, A. R. Q. (2022). Interpersonal meaning in the Gettysburg Address (Systemic Functional Analysis). ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(4), 723–728. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v5i4.24847

Laurino, J., & Kaczer, L. (2025). Pupil size tracks the effects of global context and semantic ambiguity on word-meaning processing ambiguity on word-meaning processing. Journal of Cognition, 8(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.454

Li, N., & Yang, L. (2022). Testing the representational deficit hypothesis: From the aspect of Chinese learners’ acquisition of affixation ‘-s’ for third person singular verbs and plural nouns. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(930504), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.930504

Lieber, R. (2001). Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511486296

Lieber, R., & Plag, I. (2022). The semantics of conversion nouns and -ing nominalizations: A quantitative and theoretical perspective. Journal of Linguistics, 58(2), 307–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226721000311

Loquellano, F. R., & Semblante, R. J. (2025). A Morpho-Semantic analysis of mobile legends: Bang Bang jargon and educational implications. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 46(10), 1281–1315. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.461002

Mbah, B., & Mbah, E. (2015). Tonal government in Igbo syntax. Language Sciences, 50, 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.03.002

Mesa, E. J. (2021). Analyzing the lexical meaning in Chairil Anwar’s poem titled “Aku.” Lecture: Linguistics, Education, Culture, and Literature, 1(1), 60–64. https://ojs.cbn.ac.id/index.php/lecture/article/view/1615

Nagano, A. (2023). Affixal rivalry and its purely semantic resolution among English derived adjectives. Journal of Linguistics, 59(3), 499–530. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226722000147

Pasaribu, U. R., Batubara, V., Ahmad, S. M, & Rangkuti, R. (2025). Strategic euphemism and national face-work: A sociolinguistic study of Lincoln’s Gettysburg Addresss. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa, 4(3), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurribah.v4i3.6829

Putri, H. S., Basri, H., Darmawan, Syafar, A., Kamaruddin, A., & Suriaman, A. (2021). An analysis of derivational suffixes found in reading texts of english textbook. Jurnal Kreatif Online (JKO), 9(2), 72–83. http://jurnal.fkip.untad.ac.id/index.php/jko

Ramadani, T., Anwar, S., & Wardoyo, C. (2025). Exploring lexical and contextual meaning in Olivia Rodrigo’s song lyrics in Sour Album. LITERA: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 11(2), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.36002/litera.v11i2.3727

Ramadhan, B. A., Aliffudin, M., & Jumanto. (2022). Morphological analysis of free and bound morphemes in the novel Healing is the New High by Vex King. Undergraduate Conference on Language, Literature, and Culture (UNCLLE), 2(1), 609–628. http://publikasi.dinus.ac.id/index.php/unclle

Rizki, I., & Zakrimal, Z. (2020). An analysis morpheme in smoking article. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 4(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v4i1.1379

Speranskaya, A. N. (2023). Reflexive possibilities of a language during the selection of the word of the year. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 11(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.26794/2308-944X-2023-11-1-19-25

Sudar, S., Tusino, T., & Dewi, B. R. C. (2023). Lexical and contextual meanings in song lyrics “Moana Original Soundtrack”: Pedagogical implication. English Review: Journal of English Education, 11(2), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v11i2.6919

Suhendra, E., Pertiwi, S. A., & Zaini, N. (2022). Syntactic analysis of sentence structure in “The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey.” Humanitatis: Journal of Language and Literature, 8(2), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.30812/humanitatis.v8i2.1635

Tariq, T. R., Rana, M. A., Sultan, B., Asif, M., Rafique, N., & Aleem, S. (2020). An analysis of derivational and inflectional morphemes. International Journal of Linguistics, 12(1), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v12i1.16084

Williams, F. J. (2007). Gettysburg Gospel: The Lincoln Speech That Nobody Knows. Civil War Book Review, 9(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.31390/cwbr.9.2.11

Wilson, M. L. (1995). Lincoln on the perpetuation of republican institutions: Whig and republican strategies. Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association, 16(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.5406/19457987.16.1.04

Zalizniak, A. S., Bulakh, M., Ganenkov, D., Gruntov, I., Maisak, T., & Russo, M. (2012). The catalogue of semantic shifts as a database for lexical semantic typology. Linguistics, 50(3), 633–669. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2012-0020