Reviewer Guidelines

Reviewer Guidelines

Guidelines 1) The manuscript must be written in English (Preferred) or Indonesian and must not have been published or under review elsewhere, and must be free from plagiarism.
2) Manuscripts may take the form of research articles, case studies, or literature studies.
3) Authors must register as an author. Instructions for registration and submission are available at the bottom.
4) Manuscripts are published only after passing the peer-review process.
5) Manuscripts must follow the Author Guidelines and Template provided. The writing template can be downloaded from the template link.
Reviewer Evaluation Form The following questions guide the evaluation of the manuscript. The reviewer’s assessment determines whether the manuscript is suitable for publication in this journal.
Evaluation Questions
  1. Interest and accessibility: Is the article engaging and accessible to an international audience, including both specialists and non-specialists?
  2. Scholarly contribution: Does the article make a meaningful contribution to knowledge in its field?
  3. Strengths of the article: What are the key strengths of the article?
  4. Language quality: Is the language accurate, precise, polite, and sensitive when referring to particular groups?
  5. Title and abstract alignment: Does the title reflect the content, and does the abstract adequately summarize the article?
  6. Clarity of research aims: Are the research objectives or questions clearly identified?
  7. Structure and readability: Is the article well-structured, organized, and easy to understand, including spelling, grammar, and APA formatting aspects?
  8. Strength of supporting evidence: Are arguments sufficiently supported by citations from relevant and credible sources?
  9. Accuracy of content: Are there errors, omissions, misrepresentations, or unclear sections that need attention?
  10. Assessment for policy articles: Are the sample works or primary sources broad, relevant, representative, and thoroughly and accurately analyzed?
  11. Assessment for research articles: Are the methods adequately described, appropriate to the research aims, and compliant with ethical standards (including those for research with Indigenous Peoples)?
  12. Presentation of findings: Are the results presented according to methodological standards (e.g., statistics, participant quotes) and conveyed clearly?
  13. Achievement of aims: Does the article successfully accomplish its stated objectives?
  14. Validity of conclusions: Are the conclusions supported by and consistent with the evidence presented?
  15. Policy implications: Does the article address policy implications or offer policy lessons or recommendations?
  Anonymous Reviewer / Anonymous Author (Double-Blind Review)