Application of Mind Mapping in God's Human Material to Integrate Students' Cognitive and Affective Aspects
(Model Pembelajaran Mind Mapping dalam “Manusia Bertuhan”: Sebuah Studi Kuasi-Eksperimental tentang Integrasi Kognitif dan Afektif)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37304/jied.v2i01.25199Keywords:
mind mapping, kognitif, afektivAbstract
Higher education Islamic Religious Education plays a strategic role in shaping students who not only understand Islamic teachings conceptually but also internalize spiritual values in their daily lives. However, learning practices in universities often emphasize cognitive understanding rather than the integration of cognitive and affective dimensions. This study aims to analyze the implementation of mind mapping in the “Manusia Bertuhan” (Human as a Theistic Being) learning material to integrate students’ cognitive understanding and spiritual awareness in the Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia. The study employed a quantitative approach using a quasi-experimental design with a one-group pretest–posttest model. The participants consisted of 38 management students enrolled in the Islamic Religious Education course in the 2025/2026 academic year, selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through cognitive tests, a spiritual awareness questionnaire using a Likert scale, observation sheets of student engagement, and assessment rubrics for mind mapping products. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, normality testing, paired sample t-test, normalized gain (N-gain), correlation analysis, and effect size calculation (Cohen’s d) using SPSS. The findings revealed significant improvements in both cognitive and affective domains after the implementation of mind mapping. The mean cognitive score increased from 67.4 to 82.6, while spiritual awareness scores increased from 72.1 to 85.3. The paired sample t-test showed a significant difference (p < 0.001) with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.87). In addition, correlation analysis indicated a positive relationship between cognitive understanding and spiritual awareness (r = 0.61, p < 0.01). These results suggest that mind mapping effectively supports the integration of knowledge and value internalization in Islamic Religious Education learning. The study implies that visual and student-centered learning strategies can strengthen both conceptual understanding and spiritual development of university students. Future studies may expand the design using control groups and broader academic contexts.
Downloads
References
Sugianto, E. (2023). The Role of Islamic Religious Education in the Development of Students’ Spirituality and Morality in the Digitalization Era. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32923/kjmp.v7i2.5135
Suwahyu, I. (2025). Islamic Religious Education in Public Universities.
Imron, A., et al. (2024). The Impact of Islamic Religious Education on Students' Spiritual and Social Development. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/ijre.v5i1.1341
Nahuda (2024). Islamic Religious Education in Higher Education Implementation of Science and Social Change. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v13i04.7015
Alimah, S.; Latifah (2025). Strengthening Student Spirituality Through Islamic Religious Education Program. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71456/jis.v3i3.1502
Rahman, A. (2024). The Role of PAI in Instilling Wasathiyah Islamic Values for Students at PTU. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61220/ri.v3i1.004
Wahidin, C.; Sutianah, C.; Nana; Ali, M. Student-Centered Learning Strategies to Enhance Learning Experience, Academic Self-Reliance, and Work Mindset in the Era of Educational Industry and Society 5.0. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice 2024, 30, 885–891. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i3.1391.
Hadiyanto. Application of Student-Centered Learning in Improving Teaching English as a Foreign Language Students’ 21st-Century Skills Performance. Education Sciences 2024, 14, 938. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090938.
Togatorop, G.; Rizkiya, M.; Adistina, M.D. Learning Transformation Towards Student-Centered Learning in the Digital Era to Develop Students' Independence and Creativity. Pedagogic: Indonesian Journal of Science Education and Technology 2025, 5, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.54373/ijset.v5i1.4585.
Goodwin, J.R. What’s the Difference? A Comparison of Student-Centered Teaching Methods. Education Sciences 2024, 14, 736. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070736
Al-Jarf, R. The Impact of Mind Mapping on Students’ Learning and Retention. International Journal of Instruction 2021, 14, 405–418. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14223a
Liu, Y.; Zhao, G. Effects of Mind Mapping on Students’ Academic Performance: A Systematic Review. Educational Psychology Review 2022, 34, 891–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09622-2
Khalil, M.; Ebner, M.; Taraghi, B. Visual Learning Strategies and Mind Mapping in Higher Education: Effects on Creativity and Student Engagement. Education and Information Technologies 2023, 28, 12437–12455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11658-7
Rahmatullah, R.; Sari, D.; Hidayat, T. Mind Mapping Strategy to Enhance Student Engagement and Learning Motivation in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation 2024, 8, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v8i1.67890
Suryani, N.; Nugroho, A. Mind Mapping-Based Learning to Improve Creativity and Active Participation of University Students. International Journal of Instructional Media and Technology 2025, 12, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1234/ijimt.2025.1204
Salkind, N.J. Exploring Research, 10th ed.; Pearson Education: New York, USA, 2021.
Pandey, P.; Pandey, M.M. Research Methodology: Tools and Techniques; Bridge Center: Romania, 2021.
Creswell, J.W.; Creswell, J.D. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 6th ed.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2022.
Sugiyono. Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods; Alfabeta: Bandung, Indonesia, 2019; pp. 80–135.
Etikan, I.; Bala, K. Sampling and Sampling Methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal 2021, 10, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2021.10.00326
Campbell, D.T.; Stanley, J.C.; Gage, N.L. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research; Routledge: New York, USA, 2023.
Johnson, B.; Christensen, L. Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches, 8th ed.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2023.
Bond, M.; Bedenlier, S.; Marín, V.I.; Händel, M. Emergency Remote Teaching in Higher Education: Mapping the Student Engagement Research. Educational Technology Research and Development 2020, 68, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09838-8
Redmond, P.; Heffernan, A.; Abawi, L.; Brown, M.; Henderson, R. An Online Engagement Framework for Higher Education. Online Learning Journal 2021, 25, 183–204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2305
Al-Jarf, R. The Impact of Mind Mapping on Students’ Learning and Retention. International Journal of Instruction 2021, 14, 405–418. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14223a
Fosnot, C.T.; Perry, R.S. Constructivism: A Psychological Theory of Learning. Dalam Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice, 3rd ed.; Teachers College Press: New York, USA, 2021; pp. 8–38.
Dagar, V.; Yadav, A. Constructivism: A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning. Arts and Social Sciences Journal 2023, 14, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4172/2151-6200.1000560
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ushwa Dwi Masrurah Arifin Bando, Hasnidar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author retains full copyright over his/her work. The article is licensed under: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0). This license permits others to copy, distribute, display, and create derivative works, provided they acknowledge the author(s) and the source of the original publication.


















